SirClive wrote:Yes I agree, but the title is the accolade for the overall winner in my book. I just like something that gives all an emphasis to keep trying.
I can certainly see your point - I would hope people would want to keep trying just to improve themselves but I guess not everybody is like that.
SirClive wrote:E.g. if the high score winner on each game went into a sweepstake at the end then only the top players get prizes and the best of the best have the best chance of getting the prize
Hmmm, you may be on to something here. I might donate an extra prize from my collection and use a variant of this idea... I don't think just the top 3 would be enough because if you look at last year's results, the top 3 for each game usually included at least 2 of the overall top 3... If you look at the top 5 then you start to get a few more names in as this starts to include the non-elite players.
SirClive wrote:But those are just my thoughts and if I get my way you will do the next HiScore at my venue so I can be on the committee
Find a venue, then we'll talk...