thebear wrote:Call of Duty (Infinity Ward)
Elder Scrolls (Bethesda)
GTA (Rockstar)
Uncharted (Naughty Dog)
Assassins Creed (Ubisoft)
etc etc will all still likely to be among the biggest franchises around next gen
And I'm sure I've missed many (bioware etc etc etc etc)
The trouble is someone could easily say all the games above are garbage based on their tastes, and therefore Western development sucks. I think this discussion is a bit too generalised and subjective to reach a definitive conclusion.
Maybe when comparing Western and Japanese development perhaps it's best to break things down into smaller more quanitifyable battlegrounds. In doing so we can see in some cases Western developers are either ahead or agressively chasing their Japaese counterparts. (Though of course even then we are still dealing with general perceptions.)
Compare Fifa to Pro Evo and the prevailing perception is that Western developed Fifa has reclaimed it's crown, not just with having more bells and whistles, but also in the basic gameplay stakes where it really counts.
Also this gen we have seen Western developed platformers such as Donkey Kong Country Retuns and Rayman Origins give Nintendo's Japanese in-house developers a good run for their money, when previously it could be said that Nintendo set the benchmark for platformers. I've heard a few people say there prefered those two games to the Galaxy and NSMB games.
Even in genres where perhaps Japan arguably still dominates such as RPGS, any Western improvement can hardly constitute a decline and fall. That said we could probably think of genres where Japan wipes the floor with the West, but that's why I say it's problematic to generalise.