Moderators: Darran@Retro Gamer, SirClive, CraigGrannell, FatTrucker

Roo wrote:Three years late, you tart. For the love of God, don't show this poster the Super Mario Galaxy 2 review.

retrojc wrote:... I know, some of these game on here are near 100%, but even so when I play Ultimate Mega Drie collection, I'm just playing Mame, with a new skin.
Jagfest_UK wrote:What is this Mega Drie you speak of?
DreamcastRIP wrote:retrojc wrote:... I know, some of these game on here are near 100%, but even so when I play Ultimate Mega Drie collection, I'm just playing Mame, with a new skin.
"Ultimeate" aside...
Would you still have been so disappointed if hadn't already played said illegal ROMs via MAME?
Jagfest_UK wrote:What is this Mega Drie you speak of?
Roo wrote:Three years late, you tart.

merman wrote:It is a bit late for feedback - unless the RG score was used in marketing and you feel it influenced your purchasing decision?
I don't have the review to hand, but seem to remember it got such a high score for the number of games included, the added Achievements and the bonus features including videos. At the time RG obviously felt it was worth their readers investing in it, and now at bargain prices surely it represents even greater value?
nakamura wrote:The fact it contains some of the best games around to play on a disc for a low amount of cash makes it worth a very high score. They play perfectly and have added features.
Plus you cannot compare it to what is available on emulation because emulation is not retail.
It is like saying Halo Reach is not worth £40 because I can download it for free.
butSome of the games on there may be some of the best the Mega Drive has
on a modern console these games need to have modern functionality
Darran@Retro Gamer wrote:Did any compilations have online play when it came out? Pretty sure they didn't. At the time it was the best possible compilation around so it got the best score. Simples.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests